<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Bear On Business</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bearonbusiness.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bearonbusiness.com</link>
	<description>So much has happened in telecom over the last decade, both good and bad. With BearonBusiness.com, I strive to dissect what’s happened before as well as what’s going on in the here and now. I try to capture stories from the boom, the bust, and, now, the resurgence. We are fortunate to work in a great industry (communications) at a great time (the dawn of the Internet)–let’s reminisce, reflect, and celebrate.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 14:05:41 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on &#8220;Just Doing Job&#8221; is Bogus Excuse by Dan Caruso</title>
		<link>http://bearonbusiness.com/just-doing-job-is-bogus-excuse#comment-1412</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Caruso</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 18:28:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bearonbusiness.com/?p=563#comment-1412</guid>
		<description>Bill, thanks for commenting and for reading bearonbusiness.  WorldCom was a great gutcheck.  My guess is the same was true at Enron and, most recently, large financial institutions caught up in the sub-prime mess (such as Bear Stearns).   When people are making a ton of money, it is easy for them to put their head in the sand and hope all will be okay when they peak out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill, thanks for commenting and for reading bearonbusiness.  WorldCom was a great gutcheck.  My guess is the same was true at Enron and, most recently, large financial institutions caught up in the sub-prime mess (such as Bear Stearns).   When people are making a ton of money, it is easy for them to put their head in the sand and hope all will be okay when they peak out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on &#8220;Just Doing Job&#8221; is Bogus Excuse by Bill Minkle</title>
		<link>http://bearonbusiness.com/just-doing-job-is-bogus-excuse#comment-1411</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Minkle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 18:07:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bearonbusiness.com/?p=563#comment-1411</guid>
		<description>I agree with Seth's take, and Sandi's too (hi Sandi!). Worldcom made you have a real "gutcheck" because, as we found out, they talked a real good game, were a wall street darling &#38; had a knack for doing tricks with smoke &#38; mirrors. 

After the MCI acquisition, for the western US my group had to check on reported revenues for mci metro. many buildings had no mci fiber, equipment or even type-2 circuits, thus revenue was falsely reported. When this was reported back to the legacy Worldcom management, I was told "keep quiet and fix it". With little budget, no authorization over other areas, this was impossible. 

The "gutcheck" was that something wrong was happening, and it was bigger than me/us. It led to myself and a number of other (former MFS) people to leave within a short time. When it all came down (wcom), we just had to shake our head... as Seth stated, sometimes the right thing to do is not always the easiest decision, and can cost you in the short-term. But, long-term, you keep your integrity and will be fine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Seth&#8217;s take, and Sandi&#8217;s too (hi Sandi!). Worldcom made you have a real &#8220;gutcheck&#8221; because, as we found out, they talked a real good game, were a wall street darling &amp; had a knack for doing tricks with smoke &amp; mirrors. </p>
<p>After the MCI acquisition, for the western US my group had to check on reported revenues for mci metro. many buildings had no mci fiber, equipment or even type-2 circuits, thus revenue was falsely reported. When this was reported back to the legacy Worldcom management, I was told &#8220;keep quiet and fix it&#8221;. With little budget, no authorization over other areas, this was impossible. </p>
<p>The &#8220;gutcheck&#8221; was that something wrong was happening, and it was bigger than me/us. It led to myself and a number of other (former MFS) people to leave within a short time. When it all came down (wcom), we just had to shake our head&#8230; as Seth stated, sometimes the right thing to do is not always the easiest decision, and can cost you in the short-term. But, long-term, you keep your integrity and will be fine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Early Visibility of Disconnects by Karen Cunningham</title>
		<link>http://bearonbusiness.com/early-visibility-of-disconnects#comment-1410</link>
		<dc:creator>Karen Cunningham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 14:30:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bearonbusiness.com/?p=569#comment-1410</guid>
		<description>As Billing and Collection Manager, I can attest that there is nothing more annoying than an unplanned disconnect.  Especially one that "has" to be done under the 30-day stop bill window.  If the AE's have constant contact with their customer (i.e. emails, phone calls, meetings, etc..) then there should NEVER be any surprises.  I betcha Alicia Burke knows what I'm sezin... Service Delivery has enough on their plate and anything unplanned for the month can throw off the whole game.

Just my two cents...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As Billing and Collection Manager, I can attest that there is nothing more annoying than an unplanned disconnect.  Especially one that &#8220;has&#8221; to be done under the 30-day stop bill window.  If the AE&#8217;s have constant contact with their customer (i.e. emails, phone calls, meetings, etc..) then there should NEVER be any surprises.  I betcha Alicia Burke knows what I&#8217;m sezin&#8230; Service Delivery has enough on their plate and anything unplanned for the month can throw off the whole game.</p>
<p>Just my two cents&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Fourth Punic War: The Niwot Scuffle by Dan Caruso</title>
		<link>http://bearonbusiness.com/fourth-punic-war-the-niwot-scuffle#comment-1408</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Caruso</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 04:06:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bearonbusiness.com/?p=571#comment-1408</guid>
		<description>Sour grapes perhaps?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sour grapes perhaps?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Fourth Punic War: The Niwot Scuffle by King Marty</title>
		<link>http://bearonbusiness.com/fourth-punic-war-the-niwot-scuffle#comment-1407</link>
		<dc:creator>King Marty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 03:45:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bearonbusiness.com/?p=571#comment-1407</guid>
		<description>Lets not forget to remind the readers of the bipartsan treaty made between the boss and one of his Sales folks.  The one where there was an agreement not to attack Central America because the boss was heading up to reinforce his troops in Alberta and the Northwest Territory.  Why was the boss heading north.....There was a threat builing in Alaska.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lets not forget to remind the readers of the bipartsan treaty made between the boss and one of his Sales folks.  The one where there was an agreement not to attack Central America because the boss was heading up to reinforce his troops in Alberta and the Northwest Territory.  Why was the boss heading north&#8230;..There was a threat builing in Alaska.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on &#8220;Just Doing Job&#8221; is Bogus Excuse by Sandi Mays</title>
		<link>http://bearonbusiness.com/just-doing-job-is-bogus-excuse#comment-1396</link>
		<dc:creator>Sandi Mays</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 15:28:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bearonbusiness.com/?p=563#comment-1396</guid>
		<description>I was at Worldcom, and like you, left before the collapse.  I'll never forget speaking up to one of Mr. Ebber's direct reports about the way sales and installs were reported.  I tried in vain to explain why sales and installs must equal the incremetal change in financial statement revenue.  I had the arrogance of youth working against me ... so I'm sure my explanation wasn't as good as I thought it was.

I was told in no uncertain terms, "Sandi, you are working for a new company with new expectations.  If you don't like the way we do business, then you should leave."  

I did.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was at Worldcom, and like you, left before the collapse.  I&#8217;ll never forget speaking up to one of Mr. Ebber&#8217;s direct reports about the way sales and installs were reported.  I tried in vain to explain why sales and installs must equal the incremetal change in financial statement revenue.  I had the arrogance of youth working against me &#8230; so I&#8217;m sure my explanation wasn&#8217;t as good as I thought it was.</p>
<p>I was told in no uncertain terms, &#8220;Sandi, you are working for a new company with new expectations.  If you don&#8217;t like the way we do business, then you should leave.&#8221;  </p>
<p>I did.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Gates of Churn by Mary McFetridge</title>
		<link>http://bearonbusiness.com/the-gates-of-churn#comment-1394</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary McFetridge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 04:09:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bearonbusiness.com/?p=561#comment-1394</guid>
		<description>It has been nearly one year since I retired from Onvoy. Thought I'd check in. I was the Long Distance Product Manager.  And spent 35 years in the industry.

"Churn" is a very broad term. But in each instance, the account executive should position to make the best of it. And in all cases, is shouldn't be a surprise.

The AE should know that a customer is exiting a location, or a line of business. Can't change a customer's business. Can alert management to timing. If there is no underlying cost commitment to Zayo, I don't believe in ETLs in a situation like this. A flexible business partner has a better shot at new/ongoing business if the customer is not punished for changes in their business.

If a customer is disconnecting because they got a better offer, the AE should have known that other offers were being considered. And, what the competition is offering. And be positioned well enough to have been given the opportunity to compete. And have offered the best solution to the customer's needs. 

Bring all advantages to bear. Leverage the operations person who has a good working relationship with your operations people. If it all comes down to price, the AE and the company haven't done their job.

Much more could be said. But if the customer is choosing another provider because in some way the company has let them down, fall on every sword they hand you and try for a better late than never fix. If that doesn't do it, and they are determined to leave, tell the customer that you are really sorry that you've lost their business. Make their departure as efficient as possible. Because the next step is to try to win back their business.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It has been nearly one year since I retired from Onvoy. Thought I&#8217;d check in. I was the Long Distance Product Manager.  And spent 35 years in the industry.</p>
<p>&#8220;Churn&#8221; is a very broad term. But in each instance, the account executive should position to make the best of it. And in all cases, is shouldn&#8217;t be a surprise.</p>
<p>The AE should know that a customer is exiting a location, or a line of business. Can&#8217;t change a customer&#8217;s business. Can alert management to timing. If there is no underlying cost commitment to Zayo, I don&#8217;t believe in ETLs in a situation like this. A flexible business partner has a better shot at new/ongoing business if the customer is not punished for changes in their business.</p>
<p>If a customer is disconnecting because they got a better offer, the AE should have known that other offers were being considered. And, what the competition is offering. And be positioned well enough to have been given the opportunity to compete. And have offered the best solution to the customer&#8217;s needs. </p>
<p>Bring all advantages to bear. Leverage the operations person who has a good working relationship with your operations people. If it all comes down to price, the AE and the company haven&#8217;t done their job.</p>
<p>Much more could be said. But if the customer is choosing another provider because in some way the company has let them down, fall on every sword they hand you and try for a better late than never fix. If that doesn&#8217;t do it, and they are determined to leave, tell the customer that you are really sorry that you&#8217;ve lost their business. Make their departure as efficient as possible. Because the next step is to try to win back their business.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Low Tech Solution to S.S. Problem by ray</title>
		<link>http://bearonbusiness.com/low-tech-solution-to-ss-problem#comment-1392</link>
		<dc:creator>ray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 22:24:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bearonbusiness.com/?p=562#comment-1392</guid>
		<description>Dan-

Assuming you are on a Blackberry Enterprise Server, you can also mark a non-urgent outbound message as "Low Priority" on your blackberry.  They will show up in the messages list with a little downwards arrow next to them, signifying that it is a low priority message.  Depending on how she sets up her blackberry profile, she can set it to not vibrate or alert on low priority messages.   

Similarly, you can set truly urgent messages to high priority.  The default is to sent all messages as normal priority but it is two clicks away to change it. (Options-Priority while writing a message)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dan-</p>
<p>Assuming you are on a Blackberry Enterprise Server, you can also mark a non-urgent outbound message as &#8220;Low Priority&#8221; on your blackberry.  They will show up in the messages list with a little downwards arrow next to them, signifying that it is a low priority message.  Depending on how she sets up her blackberry profile, she can set it to not vibrate or alert on low priority messages.   </p>
<p>Similarly, you can set truly urgent messages to high priority.  The default is to sent all messages as normal priority but it is two clicks away to change it. (Options-Priority while writing a message)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Low Tech Solution to S.S. Problem by Dan Caruso</title>
		<link>http://bearonbusiness.com/low-tech-solution-to-ss-problem#comment-1389</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Caruso</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 17:07:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bearonbusiness.com/?p=562#comment-1389</guid>
		<description>We are easily contented individual...call it Boulder Karma</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We are easily contented individual&#8230;call it Boulder Karma</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Low Tech Solution to S.S. Problem by Sandi Mays</title>
		<link>http://bearonbusiness.com/low-tech-solution-to-ss-problem#comment-1388</link>
		<dc:creator>Sandi Mays</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 17:01:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bearonbusiness.com/?p=562#comment-1388</guid>
		<description>You mean one more email address would make you both "content - definition: satisfied with what one is or has; not wanting more or anything else."  Who knew?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You mean one more email address would make you both &#8220;content - definition: satisfied with what one is or has; not wanting more or anything else.&#8221;  Who knew?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
